<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Addresses Global Warming</title>
	<link>http://c3.newdream.org/blog/2008/04/16/bush-addresses-global-warming/</link>
	<description>Big Changes Start With Small Steps</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: speakforthose</title>
		<link>http://c3.newdream.org/blog/2008/04/16/bush-addresses-global-warming/#comment-550</link>
		<author>speakforthose</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://c3.newdream.org/blog/2008/04/16/bush-addresses-global-warming/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Obviously Bush should have done a lot more -- and it's not clear he'll do anything now, either -- but what he doesn't seem to realize is that there is indeed a way to slash greenhouse emissions while spurring the economy. I'm associated with a company called Recycled Energy Development (recycled-energy.com), which converts manufacturers' waste heat into electricity and steam.  That means efficiency -- and the result is less pollution and lower energy costs.  There's more potential in this than almost anyone realizes.  The only thing inhibiting it is regulation designed to protect the utilities, which want to sell as much power as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously Bush should have done a lot more &#8212; and it&#8217;s not clear he&#8217;ll do anything now, either &#8212; but what he doesn&#8217;t seem to realize is that there is indeed a way to slash greenhouse emissions while spurring the economy. I&#8217;m associated with a company called Recycled Energy Development (recycled-energy.com), which converts manufacturers&#8217; waste heat into electricity and steam.  That means efficiency &#8212; and the result is less pollution and lower energy costs.  There&#8217;s more potential in this than almost anyone realizes.  The only thing inhibiting it is regulation designed to protect the utilities, which want to sell as much power as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Bush discusses climate change - SprintBio</title>
		<link>http://c3.newdream.org/blog/2008/04/16/bush-addresses-global-warming/#comment-548</link>
		<author>President Bush discusses climate change - SprintBio</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://c3.newdream.org/blog/2008/04/16/bush-addresses-global-warming/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>[...] House Webpage Washington Post Carbon Conscious Consumer    andy  actions  Climate Change President [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] House Webpage Washington Post Carbon Conscious Consumer    andy  actions  Climate Change President [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Roberta</title>
		<link>http://c3.newdream.org/blog/2008/04/16/bush-addresses-global-warming/#comment-546</link>
		<author>Alan Roberta</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://c3.newdream.org/blog/2008/04/16/bush-addresses-global-warming/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>IF President Bush had unveiled his goals for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions at the beginning of his administration instead of in its waning months, he might have actually played a role in linking the United States to global efforts to curb climate change. But the proposals he made yesterday, which in 2001 could have been a starting point for negotiations with advocates of stronger action in Congress, are now too belated and too weak to be more than a historical footnote. All three remaining presidential candidates are committed to much more stringent, mandatory reductions in carbon dioxide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF President Bush had unveiled his goals for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions at the beginning of his administration instead of in its waning months, he might have actually played a role in linking the United States to global efforts to curb climate change. But the proposals he made yesterday, which in 2001 could have been a starting point for negotiations with advocates of stronger action in Congress, are now too belated and too weak to be more than a historical footnote. All three remaining presidential candidates are committed to much more stringent, mandatory reductions in carbon dioxide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
